Home » Weekly Coursework

Category Archives: Weekly Coursework

LIBR 100 Final Assignment

Learning Outcomes for this Module 

  • LO1: Define important concepts such as: authority, peer review, bias, point of view, editorial process, purpose, audience, information privilege and more.
  • LO2: Critically assess information sources in pursuit of various purposes.
  • LO3: Ask thoughtful questions.
  • LO4: Turn questions into strategies for retrieving a variety of information sources.
  • LO5: Annotate and cite information sources accurately and ethically.
  • LO6: Reflect upon your own research process.

Tools

What You’ll NeedWhat We Used
site for hosting final assignment documentDropbox
site for submission of student workDropbox

How to Credit Us

Except where otherwise noted, the lesson plans on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 

To credit us for this module/lesson plan, cite the following: 

Newman, J., Ward, S.K.L. (2025, July 14). LIBR 100 Final Assignment. LIBR 100 OER. https://lib100oer.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2025/07/14/final-assignment/


Painting of people in a library

Final Assignment

Module Introduction

In this final assignment  you will apply all of the skills you worked on in this course. You will choose a research question and find, evaluate, and cite 2 sources of your choice (with some rules). This activity is worth 20 points.

Open the document at the following Dropbox link and make your own copy: LIBR 100 final assignment

  • Submit your completed assignment to [Dropbox link] by [due date]

Reminders

**Note that there is also a final reflection assignment, worth 10 points, due on the same date.**

LIBR 100 Final Reflection

Learning Outcomes for this Module 

  • LO1: Define important concepts such as: authority, peer review, bias, point of view, editorial process, purpose, audience, information privilege and more.
  • LO2: Critically assess information sources in pursuit of various purposes.
  • LO3: Ask thoughtful questions.
  • LO4: Turn questions into strategies for retrieving a variety of information sources.
  • LO5: Annotate and cite information sources accurately and ethically.
  • LO6: Reflect upon your own research process.

Tools

What You’ll NeedWhat We Used
site for hosting final assignment documentDropbox
site for submission of student workDropbox

How to Credit Us

Except where otherwise noted, the lesson plans on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 

To credit us for this module/lesson plan, cite the following: 

Newman, J., Ward, S.K.L. (2025, July 14). LIBR 100 Final Reflection. LIBR 100 OER. https://lib100oer.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2025/07/14/libr-100-final-reflection/


Colorful painting of people in a library

Final Reflection

Final reflection questions

This course is about the process of research, rather than the product. In keeping with that, this assignment is to reflect upon your own learning in this course. This is not an evaluation of the course content or instruction, rather we want you to think deeply about what you have learned and how you might apply that knowledge. Do not use AI to answer these questions! We want to hear your thoughts about your own learning.

Below is a list of questions we would like you to answer. You can also view/download a Microsoft Word version at this Dropbox link.

  1. Discuss your experiences learning about the research process in this class and how this work fits in with your experiences at [institution]. 
  2. Tell us something you learned in this class that you can apply now or in the future. 
  3. Was the course material what you expected it to be? What is something you would have liked to do in this course that we didn’t cover? 
  4. Revisit your Padlet post from Orientation Part 5, in which you discussed your goal(s) for this course. What did you expect to learn from this course?  Did you meet your goal(s)? Tell us why or why not.  
  5. Revisit your definition of “research” from your blog post in Orientation Part 6. Would you define the word differently today? (This is not a trick question. It’s okay to say your answer would be the same if that’s the case) 
  6. In Orientation Part 7, we had you submit a document via Dropbox. In that document you shared a “rule” you had learned about research. Do you still believe this rule to be true? Do you think about it any differently after this course?
  7. Has your work on our class activities changed the way you think about or approach research? Please describe. 

How to submit your final reflection

You have 3 options for how you can format and submit your answers. CHOOSE ONE of the following:

  1. Type out and submit your answers at [Dropbox link] by [due date].
  2. Have a conversation with one of your instructors about these questions in a videoconference on Zoom. Fifteen-minute appointments are available [dates]
    • [Sign-up link to meet with professors]
  3. Create a short video or voice memo in which you answer these questions, and submit it via the [Dropbox link] by [due date]. You can record yourself in any way that is available to you and that you can share with us electronically. Be sure to answer all 7 of the questions above.

Reminder

***The final assignment, worth 20 points, is also due on the same date.***

Evaluating Sources Part 1: Fact-checking

Learning Outcomes for this Module 

  • LO2: Critically assess information sources in pursuit of various purposes.
  • LO3: Ask thoughtful questions.  
  • LO5: Annotate and cite information sources accurately and ethically.
  • LO6: Reflect upon your own research process. 

Tools

What You’ll NeedWhat We Used
Forum for student posts (2)Padlet

Note to instructors

We update the linked articles in Part 4 to keep current with the news cycle. The articles linked here are from the Spring 2025 semester.

Additionally, for Part 4 we ask student to use skills from the Understanding URLs module.

How to Credit Us

Except where otherwise noted, the lesson plans on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 

To credit us for this module/lesson plan, cite the following: 

Newman, J., Ward, S.K.L. (2025, July 14). Evaluating Sources Part 1 – fact-checking. LIBR 100 OER. https://lib100oer.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2025/07/14/evaluating-sources-part-1-fact-checking/


Evaluating Sources Part 1: Fact-Checking

“credibility” by flickr user Bob May, https://flic.kr/p/ruugue

Module Introduction

For this module, we will work evaluating sources, including into fact-checking habits that you can use every day, as it’s getting harder every week to separate fact from fiction in the news cycle. This module consists of the following activities:

  1. Watch the embedded videos (I also included the links to YouTube in case you can’t watch them here)
  2. Read a chapter from Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers
  3. Gut- and Fact-checking Padlet Post (4 points)
  4. Going upstream and evaluation Padlet (6 points)

Part 1 – Online Verification Skills

Watch the following videos. There are four that will play in order embedded below, and one additional video embedded under that. If you can’t get the embedded media to play, here’s a link to the YouTube playlist for the first four: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsSbsdukQ8VYy88IiSJhz4NyBxxtLzsNr

One more video/skill – check the claim & find better coverage. This was clearly done during peak Covid, but the shortcut skill he demonstrates in this video is useful.


Part 2 – Check Your Emotions

Read the following chapter, “Building a Fact-Checking Habit by Checking Your Emotions,” from the online book Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers by Mike Caulfield: https://pressbooks.pub/webliteracy/chapter/building-a-habit-by-checking-your-emotions/

The above book is full of great tips and information for you as you are searching for materials online, so I urge you to read more than just the one chapter if you find it interesting: https://pressbooks.pub/webliteracy/


Part 3 – Gut- and Fact-Checking (4 points)

  1. Find a story or post online, via any social media platform (TikTok, Instagram, X, etc) that you think is intended to provoke an emotional reaction. We’ve all seen these types of “clickbait” stories. Social media is full of them!
  2. Check your emotions.
  3. Fact-check the claim(s) made in the story by reading laterally (move off the site in question and search what others say about it), Google the claim, and/or use a fact-checking site like Snopes.com, factcheck.org, or politifact.com.
  4. Finally, share the post on Padlet and write up briefly (1-2 sentences) what you learned about your news story. If you are unable to find anything on the fact-checking sites or via a Google search, that is important information as well – we want to know that you tried and what you did or did not find out.

Be sure to include your name on the post!

Direct link to Padlet.


Part 4 – Going Upstream and Evaluation (6 points)

Choose one of the following links to investigate: 

Then create a Padlet post under the source you chose. Briefly describe your process, what you noticed, and what you learned, addressing ALL of the questions below. This is a deeper investigation than we’ve asked you to do before, so please read and respond to all the prompts.

  1. Decode the URL using the skills you learned in Understanding URLs.
  2. Visit the link and observe what you can about the source.
    • Is the organization in the URL the original source of the reporting?
    • If not, where was this story originally reported?
    • What sources did the author(s) draw on for this story?
  3. Read laterally, by using the Wikipedia trick for the source as you did earlier, but look a little deeper. Go beyond Wikipedia and see what else you can learn about the source of the information.
    • What can you identify about the news organization? Is the organization named in the URL the original source of the reporting?
  4. Then “go upstream” to find original sources of content reported on in these stories. They all should have links out to other sources/content.
  5. What can you infer about this source from all the parts of your investigation? In what context(s) might this source be useful?

Link to Padlet

Search Strategies 2

Learning Outcomes for this Module 

  • LO3: Ask thoughtful questions.  
  • LO4: Turn questions into strategies for retrieving a variety of information sources.
  • LO5: Annotate and cite information sources accurately and ethically.
  • LO6: Reflect upon your own research process. 

Tools

What You’ll NeedWhat We Used
Forum for posting responseblog post on course site

Note to instructors

The “how-to” videos are specific to our Libraries’ search tool, OneSearch. We left them in as placeholders for this module but of course we expect that you will replace them with content relevant to your institution.

How to Credit Us

Except where otherwise noted, the lesson plans on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 

To credit us for this module/lesson plan, cite the following: 

Newman, J., Ward, S.K.L. (2025, July 14). Search Strategies 2. LIBR 100 OER. https://lib100oer.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2025/07/14/search-strategies-2/


Cat looking at books on a bookshelf

Search Strategies 2

Module Introduction

In Reading Strategies you considered how you might approach different types of sources as a reader and researcher. In Search Strategies 1, you practiced asking questions and developing keywords from sources you’ve read. Here in Search Strategies 2, we’ll be combining some of these concepts. You’ll be using the keywords you identified to help you find different types of information, using OneSearch, a search engine that looks through material at the Hunter College Libraries.

This module consists of the following parts:

  1. Finding Reference Sources Using OneSearch (Video)
  2. Finding News Sources Using OneSearch & Your Free Newspaper Accounts (Video)
  3. Finding Journal Articles Using OneSearch
  4. Search for Different Source Types & Share Your Results (Blog post – 10 points)

Part 1 – Finding Reference Sources Using OneSearch

Watch the following video (2 minutes, 10 seconds).


Part 2 – Finding News Sources…

Part 2.a … Using OneSearch

Watch the following video (1 minute, 34 seconds)

Part 2.b. … Using Newspaper Websites

Claim your free newspaper accounts!

Hunter students can claim three free online subscriptions with a valid Hunter email address: The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Financial Times (London). By claiming your accounts, you gain access to both of these major newspapers directly though their websites without having to go through the Hunter Libraries site. No more paywalls for you while you’re a student!

  1. New York Times: NYTimes.com/passes
  2. Wall Street Journal: www.wsj.com/Hunter
  3. Financial Times: www.ftt/hunter

You can use the search function on each newspaper’s website to search for relevant content.


Part 3 – Finding Journal Articles Using OneSearch

To filter your results to only material published in peer-reviewed journals, you can use the filter “Peer-Reviewed Journals” under the “Limit To” heading. This filter is circled in green in the following image. Note: filtering to “peer-reviewed journals” will eliminate all other source types (like news sources, reference sources, books, videos) from your search. You should only use this filter when the only sources you want are journal articles.

Screenshot of OneSearch screen with "Peer-Reviewed Journals" filter circled

Part 4 – Search for Different Source Types & Share Your Results (blog post – 10 points)

Search Instructions

  • Find your post from Search Strategies 1 and look up the research question and keywords you developed, OR use a research question and keywords you developed for a class.
  • Using your keywords, search for one of each of the following source types using OneSearch (or your newspaper accounts for the news source). Use only one keyword a time when you search.
    • reference entry
    • news source
    • journal article

Blog Post Instructions

  • Create a post on our site using your name in the title like this “Your Name – Search Strategies 2”, then respond to the questions below in your post.

Questions to answer in your blog post

  1. What is your research question?
  2. What 3 sources did you find? For each source include the following information:
    • An APA-style citation – see samples below. (You will have 3 total citations: 1 reference entry, 1 news article, 1 journal article. If you use a citation generator please make sure your citation is complete – there should be enough information for someone else to find your source again, including a permanent link)
    • What word(s) did you enter into the search box? Please be specific and include all the words you used in your search, exactly as you entered them.
    • What filter(s) did you use?
    • How could this source contribute to your understanding of the topic or help you answer your research question?
  3. What is one thing you learned doing this activity, OR one thing that remains unclear to you?

APA style samples

Your citation must include all the information needed to find the source again. Use the APA style site for reference: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples

AuthorLastName, AuthorFirstInitial. (date, or n.d. if no date is available). Entry or article title. Title of the publication. permanent link (if available)

News article:

Carey, B. (2019, March 22). Can we get better at forgetting? The New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/22/health/memory-forgetting-psychology.html

Reference entry:

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Just-world hypothesis. In APA dictionary of psychology. Retrieved January 18, 2020, from https://dictionary.apa.org/just-world-hypothesis

Search Strategies 1

Learning outcomes for this module

  • LO3: Ask thoughtful questions.
  • LO4: Turn questions into strategies for retrieving a variety of information sources.

Tools

What You’ll NeedWhat We Used
Forum for discussionPadlet
A place for students to submit/share their answers to the activityBlog posts on our WordPress-based course site

How to Credit Us

Except where otherwise noted, the lesson plans on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 

To credit us for this module/lesson plan, cite the following: 

Newman, J., Ward, S.K.L. (2025, July 10). Search Strategies 1. LIBR 100 OER. https://lib100oer.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2025/07/10/search-strategies-1/


A collection of white magnets containing individual words in black typeface.

Search Strategies 1

Module Introduction

For this module, we use the sources we looked at in Reading Strategies to generate questions and keywords to search for more information 

We frequently encounter students who think they must come up with their search terms (keywords) all on their own. In reality, most researchers use sources they have already read to find more related sources. This strategy works when you have assigned readings for a class, or when you encounter a news story or social media post you’re curious about. 

The module consists of the following parts: 

  • Padlet for asking questions – 2 activities (3 points)
  • Padlet for identifying keywords/search terms from the actual readings (3 points)
  • Blog post: developing a preliminary search plan (4 points)

Part 1: Asking Questions Padlet (3 points)

There are four questions on the Padlet below that relate to the sources you read in Reading Strategies. There are two activities below that we are asking you to post on this Padlet. Be sure to do both to get full credit for this module.

Part 1.1 – Asking sub-questions

A sub-question is a question you’d need to explore or answer in order to form your answer or understand some aspect of the larger question/topic. Use the four main questions on this Padlet as a starting point for asking sub-questions.

Activity:

  • Write and post 2 sub-questions on this Padlet under any of the main questions you choose. Be sure to include your name on your posts for credit.

Link to Padlet

4.1.2 – Identifying Open and Closed-Ended Questions

Different types of questions can be used for different purposes in research and in life. Questions are often categorized as open-ended or closed-ended questions.

A former student offered this explanation of the main difference between open- and closed-ended questions:

Closed-ended questions are for when you want an answer. Open-ended questions are for when you want to start a conversation. – Dezwon, LIBR 100 student, Spring 2020

Sometimes we need an answer; sometimes we need to explore and engage in conversation. Some questions don’t fit into either category and instead fall somewhere in between. A few things to look for:

  • Closed-ended questions often have a single answer, or they can be answered with a single source of information
  • Open-ended questions often require a complex or nuanced answer, or may require engaging with multiple sources of information

Activity:

  • Identify one open-ended question and one closed-ended question by commenting under the relevant Padlet post. They can be your own questions or a classmate’s questions. Be sure to include your name in your comments for credit.

Part 2: Using readings and questions to identify keywords (3 points)

Now we are going to use your questions and the related readings to identify keywords to search for new information. The Padlet below has sections for each of the readings from Module 3.

For this activity, choose one reading and pick out just one or two new keywords (with no “repeats”). Remember that we are talking about strategies here, so use the readings to identify these new keywords.

Post your keywords (be sure to include your name) under the reading you chose. You can drag/drop your post under the correct reading if it appears in a different location.

Link to Padlet


4.3: Developing a preliminary strategy (4 points)

Choose a question from the Part 1 Padlet you are interested in – this can be one of the top-level questions, or any of the sub-questions. Select several keywords related to that question that you want to test out. These can be keywords from the Part 2 Padlet, or new ones that you come up with. Identify what kinds of information you want to find that will help you explore this question.

Write a blog post titled “Your Name – Search Strategies 1.” The post should include the following information

  • The question you chose
  • 3-5 keywords that you want to test out to find more information
  • What kind of information you think will help you explore/understand more about this topic.

When listing types of information, be specific – don’t say “articles” but tell us what kind of articles: news articles, peer reviewed articles/research studies, magazine articles, etc.


Evaluating Sources Part 2: Authority & Expertise

Learning Outcomes for this Module

  • LO1: Define important concepts such as: authority, peer review, bias, point of view, editorial process, purpose, audience, information privilege and more. 
  • LO2: Critically assess information sources in pursuit of various purposes.  
  • Ask thoughtful questions.  
  • LO4: Turn questions into strategies for retrieving a variety of information sources.
  • LO6: Reflect upon your own research process. 

Tools

What You’ll NeedWhat We Used
Forum for discussion and reflection postsPadlet
Platform to share an introduction to “Authority is Constructed & Contextual”Microsoft365/PowerPoint & YouTube

How to Credit Us

Except where otherwise noted, the lesson plans on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 

To credit us for this module/lesson plan, cite the following: 

Newman, J., Ward, S.K.L. (2025, June 11). Authority & expertise module. LIBR 100 OER. https://lib100oer.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2025/06/11/evaluating-sources-part-2-authority-expertise/


Student looking at a book under a sign that has the word Criticism on it.

Authority & Expertise

Library. The Wistarion, p. 36, 1965, Archives & Special Collections, Hunter College Libraries, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York City. https://flic.kr/p/rUdf9R

Module Introduction

In this module we continue to evaluate sources. This time, we’re discussing concepts of credibility, authority, and expertise, in an academic context and beyond. At the end of the module, you will evaluate an information source taking into account concepts from this module.

This module consists of the following 4 parts:

  1. Slideshow presentation on authority and expertise
  2. Discussion post (Padlet): how authority is constructed (3 points)
  3. Brainstorming post (Padlet): Who is the expert or authority? (3 points)
  4. Discussion post (Padlet) Group evaluation of a source (4 points)

1 – Slideshow Presentation on Authority & Expertise

Watch and listen to this presentation. You can access it either on YouTube or PowerPoint online. The following discussion activity will refer back to these slides.


2 – Discussion post (Padlet): How Authority is Constructed (3 points)

In the slideshow presentation in this module we discussed the concept that “authority is constructed and contextual.” We’ve spent lots of time in this course discussing academic and news sources and how you might evaluate the credibility and authority of those sources and their authors. But the concept applies to other spaces as well. In this space, we ask you to reflect on how authority is constructed in a community that you belong to.

Crate a Padlet post in response to ONE of the following prompts:

  1. What is something that you consider yourself to be an expert or authority on? Who decides that you are an expert? What criteria do you and others use to determine that a person is an expert or authority on this topic? How is your expertise acknowledged and valued by others?
  2. Think about a community that you belong to. This could be anything: an academic group, a sports team or gaming club, a faith community, a family unit, an online community dedicated to a specific topic, a fandom, a study group, a workplace, etc. Describe how this group constructs authority. In other words, what are the formal or informal processes or criteria the community uses to decide who within the group is an authority or holds specialized knowledge? 

Link to Part 2 Padlet


3 – Brainstorming post (Padlet): Who is the Expert or Authority? (3 points)

When beginning research into a topic, it can be useful to think about who you consider to be an expert or authority or topic, and what aspects of the topic you think they are an authority on.

In this discussion post, you will return to the group scenarios from a past module. Check the Assigned Groups page for a reminder about which group you’re in. 

Your group scenario has been posted in the column for your group on the Part 3 Padlet below. Add a post in that column discussing who you think is an authority on the topic and on what aspect of the topic (see the last slide in the video/slideshow in Part 1 above for an example). Keep in mind that there could be many different experts or authorities.

Link to Part 3 Padlet


4 – Evaluating a source for authority and expertise (4 points)

In this part of the module, you and your group mates will read and evaluate an information source on the topic of your group scenario.

Your group scenario and a source on the scenario topic have been posted in the column for your group on the Part 4 Padlet below. Add a post in that column in which you evaluate that source for authority and expertise. Respond to one or more of the questions below with a substantive comment*

  • What can you learn about the author(s) and/or the organization or publisher of this information? How does the information you learned relate to their authority or expertise on this topic? Do you think there are limitations to their expertise or authority?
  • What can you learn about the authority or authorities cited or mentioned in the article? Do you consider them an authority or expert on the issue? Do you think there are limitations to their expertise or authority?
  • Did the source include information from authorities/experts that you didn’t expect or hadn’t listed in the brainstorm Padlet above (Part 3)?
  • Is the source missing the perspective of someone you consider an authority on the topic? Who else would you want to hear from? What would their perspective or expertise add to your understanding of the topic?

*Substantive comments are comments that go beyond one sentence or a simple idea. They should connect with ideas and concepts we’ve covered in class and demonstrate your process and use of different strategies. You may also connect with and build off of classmates’ comments provided you are furthering the discussion and not simply reiterating someone else’s ideas. We expect that your comments will be thorough and specific.

Link to Part 4 Padlet

Information Privilege

Learning Outcomes for this Module

  • LO1: Define important concepts such as: authority, peer review, bias, point of view, editorial process, purpose, audience, information privilege and more.  
  • LO4: Turn questions into strategies for retrieving a variety of information sources.
  • LO6: Reflect upon your own research process. 

Tools

What You’ll NeedWhat We Used
Forum for discussion (2)Padlet

How to Credit Us

Except where otherwise noted, the lesson plans on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 

This lesson is adapted from: Young, J. (2018). Open access: Strategies and tools for life after college. CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments). https://www.projectcora.org/assignment/open-access-strategies-and-tools-life-after-college.

To credit us for our version of the lesson, cite the following: 

Newman, J., Ward, S.K.L. (2025, June 10). Information privilege module. LIBR 100 OER. https://lib100oer.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2025/06/10/information-privilege/


Information Privilege

Image from: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sylviaduckworth/50500299716


Module Introduction

In this module we will discuss information privilege and open access (OA) resources. This module consists of the following activities:

  1. Read article and comment on Padlet (4 points)
  2. View Information Privilege/Open Access Video
  3. Use & write up your experience with open access tools (6 points)

Part 1: What is Information Privilege? (4 points)

  1. Read the Wikipedia entry on Information Privilege.
  2. Post on the Padlet below your response to the following 2 prompts:
    • Identify an area in your life where you DO have information privilege
    • Describe a time when you realized you did not have information privilege

Link to Part 1 Padlet


Part 2 – Information Privilege and Open Access

Watch this video (approx. 8 minutes) on Information Privilege & Open Access. It is important to understanding the next part of the module..

Here is an updated version of the journal price survey from 2023 from Library Journal. This video was made several years ago and prices have increased.


Part 3 – Using Open Access Tools (6 points)

So what are some open access (OA) tools you can use as alternatives to paid subscription databases? There are many choices, from repositories of OA journals and books, to browser extensions that can help you locate free copies of articles. Here are a few places to look for lots more information:

  • Our colleagues at the CUNY Graduate Center have this useful guide to OA resources that can get you started.
  • An ever-growing list of Tools for OA, part of the Open Access Directory
  • Another long list of disciplinary repositories, also part of the Open Access Directory. You can think of these as OA alternatives to our disciplinary databases (e.g. PsycINFO, Medline, AccessScience, etc.)

After completing the other parts of this module, choose two different tools or resources you learned about and use them. There are 6 to choose from on the Padlet below, but feel free to add your own in the “Your Choice” section at the bottom. Here are some suggestions, but please come up with your own ideas as well:

  • Try to find an Open Access version of an article you are using for another class by using the OA button
  • Search for research articles for another research project using one of the subject repositories or the DOAJ
  • Use PubMed to look for research on the avian flu
  • Use ERIC to find research about online/remote classroom instruction
  • Choose any other tool or task that looks interesting to you – if you’re working on a project for another class this is a good opportunity to test out something new, but do not use a library database

Please don’t feel limited to the above options – you can choose how you use these tools, just remember that they are not all the same.

Link to Part 3 Padlet.


Lesson adapted from: Young, Jessea. “Open Access: Strategies and Tools for Life after College .” CORA (Community of Online Research Assignments), 2018. https://www.projectcora.org/assignment/open-access-strategies-and-tools-life-after-college

Understanding URLs

Learning Outcomes for this Module

  • LO1: Define important concepts such as: authority, peer review, bias, point of view, editorial process, purpose, audience, information privilege and more.  
  • LO2: Critically assess information sources in pursuit of various purposes.
  • LO4:Turn questions into strategies for retrieving a variety of information sources.
  • LO6: Reflect upon your own research process.

Tools

What You’ll NeedWhat We Used
Forum for reflection postsPadlet
A tool to create a self-quizMicrosoft Forms
A place for students to submit/share their answers to the activityBlog posts on our WordPress-based course site

How to Credit Us

Except where otherwise noted, the lesson plans on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 

To credit us for this module/lesson plan, cite the following: 

Newman, J., Ward, S.K.L. (2025, June 09). Understanding URLs module. LIBR 100 OER. https://lib100oer.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2025/06/09/understanding-urls/


Understanding URLs


Module Introduction

It is easy to lose sight of the context in which information is created, especially on the internet – we all get laser-focused on finding a specific source and lose sight of how and why that source was created. In this module, you will learn to “read” and decode your the URLs of your search results in order to better understand the sources your search is returning. 

NOTE: decoding URLs doesn’t apply to results you find in a library database. This strategy is only for web search results.

This module consists of the following activities: 

  1. Internet Domains resource – how to read URLs
  1. Decoding URLs quiz (4 points)
  1. Search activity (4 points) 
  1. Brief reflection (2 points)

Internet Domains

Read this resource from the University of Washington Libraries. Link to “Internet Domains” guide, with one correction (see below): https://guides.lib.uw.edu/research/evaluate/domains

***One qualification about .org websites: the above resources states that .orgs represent nonprofit organizations. THIS IS NOT NECESSARILY TRUE. According to the Wikipedia entry for .org (emphasis is my own):

The domain name .org is a generic top-level domain (gTLD) of the Domain Name System (DNS) used on the Internet. The name is truncated from ‘organization’. It was one of the original domains established in 1985, and has been operated by the Public Interest Registry since 2003. The domain was originally “intended as the miscellaneous TLD for organizations that didn’t fit anywhere else.”[1] It is commonly used by non-profit organizations, open-source projects, and communities, but is an open domain that can be used by anyone. 

You will need to understand this content before completing the rest of the activities in this module. This content applies only to Internet Domains and URLs, not to items found within research databases through the libraries.

A few things to keep in mind:

Reminder: decoding URLs doesn’t apply to results you find in a library database. This strategy is only for web search results.

A DOI, or “Digital Object Identifier” is NOT a URL. You can read more about what they are here, but please remember that they are not URLs and cannot be read or decoded the way URLs can.

A database (JSTOR, Web of Science, EBSCO, etc) is NOT a publication. A publication is the specific name of the journal, magazine, newspaper where something is published (e.g. Journal of Dance Education, The New York Times, etc).


Decoding URLs Quiz 

Complete the following quiz on Decoding URLs. Be sure to enter your name so you get credit for the quiz.

*Note to instructors: we’ve included a link to the quiz template that you can duplicate using Microsoft Forms.


Search Activity and Blog Post

Choose two keywords or phrases and do a basic Google search with them.

Select two of the items in your Google results, visit the links, and write a post including the following information (you will have two sets of answers, one for each URL):

  1. The words you entered into the search.
  2. The link you investigated.
  3. Answers to the following questions:
    • What is the domain suffix and what does it tell you about this source?
    • What is the domain name and what does it tell you about this source?
    • What is the title of the page you visited, and what does it tell you about this source?

Remember that you are investigating the URL and what you can learn about the source. We don’t want to know what you learned about the topic of your research, rather we want to know what you learned about the individual sources/links you investigated.

*Note to instructors: we had students post on our class website, but this could just as easily be a Padlet or other online post.


Brief Reflection

For this module you learned how to break down URLs that you find online. Write up a brief reflection about your experiences with these activities.

For your post, identify the following:

  • One thing that you learned from this module that was new(ish) to you.
  • One thing you still have questions about

Reading Strategies

Learning Outcomes for this Module

  • LO2: Critically assess information sources in pursuit of various purposes.  
  • LO3: Ask thoughtful questions.  
  • LO6: Reflect upon your own research process. 

Tools

What You’ll NeedWhat We Used
Forum for discussionPadlet
Tool for group annotation of an articleHypothesis

How to Credit Us

Except where otherwise noted, the lesson plans on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 

To credit us for this module/lesson plan, cite the following: 

Newman, J., Ward, S.K.L. (2025, June 9). Reading strategies module. LIBR 100 OER. https://lib100oer.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2025/06/09/reading-strategies/


Student sleeping on couch in library with book covering their face.

Reading Strategies

Student sleeping in Hunter College Library, 1988. From The Wistarion, pp. 112-113, 1988, Archives & Special Collections, Hunter College Libraries, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York City. https://www.flickr.com/photos/hunter_college_archives/24719642252/

Module Introduction

One step that is often overlooked in the research process is reading the sources you’ve found to successfully understand and extract the information you need. In your college career so far, you may have already encountered difficulties reading academic/scholarly sources. These sources are generally written for experts, so it can be overwhelming to try to understand them if you don’t have the relevant background or expertise. For several reasons, reading an academic article from beginning to end the first time through may not the best strategy. In this module, we will think about strategies for making sense of scholarly journal articles. We will also think about when and how other kinds of sources might help us to understand concepts that we are not experts on.

This module consists of the following parts:

  1. Read “Anatomy of a Scholarly Article”
  2. Watch “How to Preview a Text”
  3. Read and take group notes on a scholarly article (asynchronous group work – 6 points)
  4. Read or Listen to a News Story
  5. Read Encyclopedia Entries Related to the Topic of the Study
  6. Write a reflective Padlet post (individual work – 4 points)

Part 1 – Read “Anatomy of a Scholarly Article”

Read the page “Anatomy of a Scholarly Article” from the Research Toolkit created for Hunter College by Wendy Hayden and Stephanie Margolin. (You do NOT need to do the activity at the bottom of the page)

Note that not all scholarly articles will feature all–or any–of the elements listed in the Anatomy of a Scholarly Article. Those elements are most common in the sciences and the social sciences. Articles in the arts and humanities sometimes have an abstract (though often they don’t), and they rarely have labeled sections like “Introduction,” “Conclusion,” etc.


Part 2 – Watch “How to Preview a Text”

Watch the video “How to Preview a Text” (3.5 minutes) from Excelsior University’s Online Reading Lab.


Part 3 – Take Notes Together on a Scholarly Article (6 points)

In this activity you will practice reading a scholarly article and take notes on it (asynchronously) with a group.

Please make sure you follow the instructions below in order to get full credit for this activity. You need to make at least 3 total comments (described below) on this article in order to get full credit.

  1. We do not want you to read the full article, but to employ some reading strategies from earlier in this module. Using some strategies you’ve read about, read/skim this article and make a minimum of 2 comments about any of the following (highlight the relevant section of text and leave your comment). IMPORTANT: Please note that if you want to comment on the same question that another student has already answered, then your comment must add something new to the conversation (not just repeat what the other person has written):
    • What section(s) of the article are the most important for your understanding of the content? Why?
    • What can you learn from the title of this article?
    • What can you learn from the list of authors of this article?
    • What did the authors set out to learn in this study? (What was their research question?)
    • What did the authors do to find an answer to their research question? In other words, how did they conduct this study?
    • What did the researchers learn by performing this study?
    • What did the authors learn about this topic from other researchers? In other words, what past ideas and research are they building on?
    • What keywords can you identify that are important to the understanding of this article? Why are they important?  
  2. In addition to the above 2 comments, identify and make at least 1 comment on something that you don’t understand about this article.

Link to the article

Link to “If I Fits I Sits: A Citizen Science Investigation into Illusory Contour Susceptibility in Domestic Cats (Felis Silvestris Catus)”

Full APA citation for the article used in this activity

Smith, G. E., Chouinard, P. A., & Byosiere, S.-E. (2021). If I fits I sits: A citizen science investigation into illusory contour susceptibility in domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 240, 105338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105338.


Part 4 – Read a News Story about the Same Study

Read (or listen to) the following news story, which originally aired on the National Public Radio (NPR) show All Things Considered and has been transcribed into text. You are not required to annotate this article.

Cats Take ‘If I Fits I Sits’ Seriously, Even If The Space Is Just An Illusion

APA citation for this news story

Cats take “if I fits I sits” seriously, even If the space Is just an illusion [Radio broadcast transcript]. (2021, May 10). In All Things Considered. National Public Radio, Inc. (NPR). https://www.npr.org/transcripts/994262792


Part 5 – Read Two Encyclopedia Entries Related to the Topic of the Study

  1. Wikipedia entry on “Illusory Contours”
  2. Entry on “Visual Illusions” in the Encyclopedia of Neuroscience

(You are not required to annotate these sources)

APA citations for these encyclopedia entries

Wenderoth, P. (2009). Visual illusions. In Binder, M.D., Hirokawa, N., Windhorst, U. (eds) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi-org.proxy.wexler.hunter.cuny.edu/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_6356

Illusory counters. (2024, June 7). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_contours


Part 6 – Reflection on Reading Strategies

Please CHOOSE ONE of the following prompts and respond to it in a post on the Padlet:

  1. Was your strategy for reading the news story different from your strategy for reading the scholarly article? Explain how and why.
  2. Wikipedia is a generalized encyclopedia while the Encyclopedia of Neuroscience is what we call a specialized encyclopedia. What differences do you notice between the two? Which one was more useful to you? Who do you think the other one would be useful to?’
  3. We asked you to identify things you didn’t understand in the scholarly article. Describe a strategy you would use to help yourself understand one or more of these points.
  4. How might the different source types you read in this module (scholarly journal article, news story, entry from Wikipedia, entry from a specialized encyclopedia) be useful in different ways as you attempt to learn more about the topic?

Be sure to include your name on your post to get credit for your work.

Link to Padlet


Extra Resources (Optional)

These resources are for those who would like to learn more about reading and note-taking strategies.

Reading strategies

Annotating texts

Note-taking (in-class)